Why I reject papers in journals?
Thursday, February 18th, 2010[Click the above picture to see a larger view]
As a reviewer in several journals in the field of Catalysis, I have recommended to reject nearly 80% of manuscripts (of about 30 manuscripts) which was sent to me by the editors in the last two years. Most of the manuscripts submitted were from universities in China. I do not know, if this is a coincidence or because so many manuscripts was submitted from the Chinese university. However, I also found that the quality of some manuscripts submitted from leading universities in Europe was low.
The following are the reasons why I do not accept manuscripts for publication:
- Originality. Usually in a paper that is not original, the results is very easy to predict.
- Speculation. Discussion and conclusion are not supported by the complete set of accurate data. Because of that the jump into conclusion statement was found in the manuscript.
- Logic. The analytical technique used is not appropriate, nor logic in analyzing the data.

Richard Feynman, a Physics Nobel laureate once said that, as a scientist, he enjoys the beauty of flowers with more in-depth than an artist. Artist or ordinary people just enjoy and appreciate only the external aesthetic of flower. As a scientist he was more to enjoy the beauty of flowers – not just from the external beauty of flower – but much deeper, such as molecular structure, metabolism, biophysics and the other scientific aspects.
What are you looking for in your career?


